I just finished reading a recap about the Ad Age Small Agency Conference held in New Orleans recently. One of the discussions that permeated the conference was “how to replace the term small.” Everyone seemed in agreement that the word small gave the connotation that the agency did not have the ability to provide the client with all the services needed to do a first class job of communication. In some cases this might be true, but in many cases, the “small” agency is faster, more creative, more affordable, and just as darn good as the mega-agencies at providing services for clients.
Imagery is small. We are also what we term “virtual.” We don’t have fancy offices that increase our overhead. We can provide all the marketing services needed by clients – research, strategic planning, all the advertising and public relations services including creative and media, web and social media services, and a few other things that our larger competitors don’t touch, like custom training programs, meeting facilitation and custom secret shopper programs. The client has access to what she or he needs, when she or he needs it, without having to pay for the overhead of "all those people under the same roof."
How can we do it? We have a network of exceptional professionals that we bring in when the client needs the services.
Are we free? No. Are we cheap? No. We’re cost effective. Let’s face it, folks, no one gives her time and talent away. Do we get results? Yes. And we have clients that will tell you that.
Our clients are small to medium sized businesses and non-profits. The small business and non-profit clients used to think they couldn't afford an agency. We convinced them that they could and been partners in their growth.
We might be small in numbers "under the same roof," but we’re mighty in creativity, experience, skills, and abilities, and we know how to get the job done excellently. Small can be a good thing, even in the agency business.
Showing posts with label media exposure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media exposure. Show all posts
Friday, July 23, 2010
Friday, September 4, 2009
A 60-Second Introduction to SEO
Hello. I am Ernie Schwarcz, and I am very proud of having been invited by Pat to be a guest phlogger and to occasionally share some Search Engine Optimization (SEO) insights and experiences with you.
Before I start, here are a few remarks (since we don’t know each other yet). First, I will assume that you have at least some basic SEO knowledge. If you are a total beginner (don’t worry, at one point we all were!), you’re welcome to refer to my introductory SEO articles on my own website. Here’s the link: www.seotrump.com/seo_articles.php
Second, I’ll try to keep my content professional but the style lighthearted. After all, SEO is great if it works, but can be quite technical on the bumpy road to success. Therefore, I’ll try to cite simple yet vivid examples and real-life comparisons.
Finally, you are welcome and encouraged to comment or criticize. The give and take of a discussion makes these topics even more interesting.
Let’s get started. First, a very simplified overview you can consider a 49-line (I counted!) crash course:
We all know that On-Page ( = Organic) SEO is the science of structuring, writing and programming a website in such a way that search engines will place the site high in their search results (for the desired keywords). This is my definition; Wikipedia’s you can find here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization. To this end, the search engines (to simplify matters, let’s take Google) frequently “crawl” millions of websites in order to register their content, HTML and other site “makeup”. Then Google files some of what it found. After every new crawl, that information usually gets updated in its databases.
When a web user searches for a given keyword or search term, such as “Montreal SEO Services” (I wonder where I got this example from …), Google compares this search term with all the information it has collected and pre-sorted from all similar and comparable sites. Then it very quickly sorts the information and displays on its search results thousands of websites most important in relation to “Montreal SEO Services” – most relevant websites first. Of course, every website wants to be first because first ranked, first clicked, first to get the opportunity.
For easier understanding, here is an example from real life. Let’s assume Jane Doe walks into her local library looking for books. The librarian will retrieve books for her based on the subject she chooses, but if Jane’s subject is too general, she’ll be asked for clarification. In other words, she’ll have to narrow down her topic. Initially, Jane is inexplicably shy. But eventually she tells the librarian that she is looking for books on bad marriages, good poison, and outstanding criminal lawyers. Now we are talking, and a successful search can be done within minutes.
A search engine is not a librarian and has no idea what you really want when you type in a general expression. But what a search engine will do is compare the search query to the information in their databases, find the contents which most closely match the requested information, and then rank them in order of importance, or relevance, whereby the most relevant contents are displayed first.
And these contents (as mentioned, they regularly are collected by the search engines) are simply what web designers or webmasters have written into their web sites, either explicitly in the copy, the HTML code, or - implicitly - as a set of logical connections, by way of internal and external links to the individual web pages.
So it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the better designed and written a web site, the more relevant its content will be for the search engines for certain keywords or search terms. Increased relevance will, in turn, rank the site higher on the search engines' results pages for those terms.
How does Google determine what is “relevant”? Great question. The answer is: it has its own set of hundreds of very complex mathematical and logical rules, aka algorithms. Of course, we would all love to know these rules as they would guarantee top Search Engine Results Positions (SERPs) at all times. Alas, no-one knows for sure since Google guards its algorithms like the vaults of Fort Knox (and, to boot, often modifies and even changes them to keep us on our toes).
Well, not quite. The general principles are more or less known, and Google itself publishes some general guidelines. What is not known is the exact weight Google attaches to each of those rules and in which precise combination they are most effective. Add to this the fact that Yahoo and Bing have different criteria and algorithms, and you can imagine how difficult it is to optimize a website to satisfy all the Search Engines’ criteria.
Welcome to the complex world of SEO!
This was a lengthy introduction and future phlogs will be much shorter (promise!), but once you’ve read the above, future tips and pointers (to follow, unless Pat ejects me) will suddenly become quite common-sense and logical.
Ernie Schwarcz is President of SEO Trump Consultant Company in Montreal, Canada. SEO Trump Consulting is a Web Design & SEO Services Company specializing in high-quality yet affordable Web & SEO Services. Services are offered to US, Canadian and International clients in a a number of languages, including English, French, German, Chinese, Spanish, and Hungarian.
Before I start, here are a few remarks (since we don’t know each other yet). First, I will assume that you have at least some basic SEO knowledge. If you are a total beginner (don’t worry, at one point we all were!), you’re welcome to refer to my introductory SEO articles on my own website. Here’s the link: www.seotrump.com/seo_articles.php
Second, I’ll try to keep my content professional but the style lighthearted. After all, SEO is great if it works, but can be quite technical on the bumpy road to success. Therefore, I’ll try to cite simple yet vivid examples and real-life comparisons.
Finally, you are welcome and encouraged to comment or criticize. The give and take of a discussion makes these topics even more interesting.
Let’s get started. First, a very simplified overview you can consider a 49-line (I counted!) crash course:
We all know that On-Page ( = Organic) SEO is the science of structuring, writing and programming a website in such a way that search engines will place the site high in their search results (for the desired keywords). This is my definition; Wikipedia’s you can find here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization. To this end, the search engines (to simplify matters, let’s take Google) frequently “crawl” millions of websites in order to register their content, HTML and other site “makeup”. Then Google files some of what it found. After every new crawl, that information usually gets updated in its databases.
When a web user searches for a given keyword or search term, such as “Montreal SEO Services” (I wonder where I got this example from …), Google compares this search term with all the information it has collected and pre-sorted from all similar and comparable sites. Then it very quickly sorts the information and displays on its search results thousands of websites most important in relation to “Montreal SEO Services” – most relevant websites first. Of course, every website wants to be first because first ranked, first clicked, first to get the opportunity.
For easier understanding, here is an example from real life. Let’s assume Jane Doe walks into her local library looking for books. The librarian will retrieve books for her based on the subject she chooses, but if Jane’s subject is too general, she’ll be asked for clarification. In other words, she’ll have to narrow down her topic. Initially, Jane is inexplicably shy. But eventually she tells the librarian that she is looking for books on bad marriages, good poison, and outstanding criminal lawyers. Now we are talking, and a successful search can be done within minutes.
A search engine is not a librarian and has no idea what you really want when you type in a general expression. But what a search engine will do is compare the search query to the information in their databases, find the contents which most closely match the requested information, and then rank them in order of importance, or relevance, whereby the most relevant contents are displayed first.
And these contents (as mentioned, they regularly are collected by the search engines) are simply what web designers or webmasters have written into their web sites, either explicitly in the copy, the HTML code, or - implicitly - as a set of logical connections, by way of internal and external links to the individual web pages.
So it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the better designed and written a web site, the more relevant its content will be for the search engines for certain keywords or search terms. Increased relevance will, in turn, rank the site higher on the search engines' results pages for those terms.
How does Google determine what is “relevant”? Great question. The answer is: it has its own set of hundreds of very complex mathematical and logical rules, aka algorithms. Of course, we would all love to know these rules as they would guarantee top Search Engine Results Positions (SERPs) at all times. Alas, no-one knows for sure since Google guards its algorithms like the vaults of Fort Knox (and, to boot, often modifies and even changes them to keep us on our toes).
Well, not quite. The general principles are more or less known, and Google itself publishes some general guidelines. What is not known is the exact weight Google attaches to each of those rules and in which precise combination they are most effective. Add to this the fact that Yahoo and Bing have different criteria and algorithms, and you can imagine how difficult it is to optimize a website to satisfy all the Search Engines’ criteria.
Welcome to the complex world of SEO!
This was a lengthy introduction and future phlogs will be much shorter (promise!), but once you’ve read the above, future tips and pointers (to follow, unless Pat ejects me) will suddenly become quite common-sense and logical.
Ernie Schwarcz is President of SEO Trump Consultant Company in Montreal, Canada. SEO Trump Consulting is a Web Design & SEO Services Company specializing in high-quality yet affordable Web & SEO Services. Services are offered to US, Canadian and International clients in a a number of languages, including English, French, German, Chinese, Spanish, and Hungarian.
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Guest Blogger: APRs take PR to Heroic Proportions
Our guest "Phlogger" this week is Michael Tullier, APR, director of external relations for the Auburn University College of Education.
It doesn’t take a superhero to fend off reporters and save the CEO in distress, but in today’s fast-paced world of public relations, there is a group of professionals with the demonstrated “powers” needed to be successful. Some mild-mannered, some daring – but all equipped with the knowledge, skills and abilities demanded of the public relations profession – these professionals certainly don’t keep their Accredited in Public Relations identity a secret.
Professionals don’t earn their APR through exposure to the yellow sun or the bite of a radioactive spider. Each builds on book smarts and practical experience and approaches the process with different expectations. But since “deliverables” in our profession are critical, pursuing Accreditation results in power-packed benefits for professionals, employers and the profession as a whole.
Combining introspection and education. Accredited professionals have reported through surveys that the APR process is reflective, introspective and knowledge-expanding. And while we celebrate those employers who require the APR as a requisite for employment or financially reward those who achieve this milestone, a vast majority of APRs find contentment in the personal rewards Accreditation offers. Through a process that 96 percent of APRs surveyed find valuable, 96 percent would recommend to a colleague, and 93 percent feel assessed the skills needed to succeed in the profession, APRs acknowledge the credential for building confidence and credibility while expanding their knowledge content.
Gaining marketplace credibility. Accreditation is not a new concept to corporate America. Manufacturers, educational institutions, medical facilities and the like seek the integrity that comes with their industry’s or discipline’s accrediting endorsement. Should it not make sense that companies would seek the same in their hiring practices? Consider that the human resource industry itself has, not one, but two distinct accrediting levels for human resource professionals. Accredited public relations professionals demonstrate their commitment to mastering – and continuing to develop – the knowledge, skills and abilities, or KSAs, desired by today’s employers. The APR credential also helps employers clearly and effectively evaluate one’s qualifications when compared to applicants from other professions who see public relations as a chance to “try something new” or to take their career “in a new direction.”
Defining the profession. The Accreditation process benefits our profession by bringing structure and definition to it. As part of the Universal Accreditation Board’s 2003 effort to redesign the APR process, APR leaders sought a better understanding of what our profession entails and what it takes to be successful in today’s PR environment. And guess what? It didn’t reveal necessary characteristics like “being a people person.” It created clear delineations between the tactical and strategic practice levels, emphasized the professional’s counselor role, and clarified that public relations doesn’t “just happen” – it is a deliberate, ethically based executive function with measurable results.
Accreditation in Public Relations has prepared – and continues to prepare – professionals to lead by example in our industry and in our associations. Within the nine participating organizations of the Universal Accreditation Board, you’ll find within these associations’ top volunteer and paid leadership levels Accredited professionals equipped to advance the opportunities for their fellow professionals and our profession. As a result, those who have demonstrated an intricate understanding of our profession and their own professional practice are imminently qualified to see our industry into the coming decades.
I’m not suggesting that “APR” comes emblazoned on its own red-and-blue spandex outfit, part of a gadget-ridden utility belt or with powers sufficient to gain you a title role on NBC’s Heroes. What it does, however, is empower professionals in a manner each finds befitting their personal, professional and volunteer expectations. For professionals eager to distinguish themselves in today’s marketplace, Accreditation in Public Relations offers a means of garnering positive attention and that “second glance” in a way that wearing a cape to work never will.
Power up today at www.praccreditation.org.
Michael Tullier, APR, is director of external relations for the Auburn University College of Education in Auburn, Ala. An award-winning public relations professional with more than 15 years of experience as an organization’s chief public relations counsel and spokesperson, Michael achieved accreditation in 2003. Tullier served as chair of the Universal Accreditation Board in 2008 and is its current immediate past chair. During his UAB tenure, which began in 2005, he has represented both the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) and Southern Public Relations Federation (SPRF).
It doesn’t take a superhero to fend off reporters and save the CEO in distress, but in today’s fast-paced world of public relations, there is a group of professionals with the demonstrated “powers” needed to be successful. Some mild-mannered, some daring – but all equipped with the knowledge, skills and abilities demanded of the public relations profession – these professionals certainly don’t keep their Accredited in Public Relations identity a secret.
Professionals don’t earn their APR through exposure to the yellow sun or the bite of a radioactive spider. Each builds on book smarts and practical experience and approaches the process with different expectations. But since “deliverables” in our profession are critical, pursuing Accreditation results in power-packed benefits for professionals, employers and the profession as a whole.
Combining introspection and education. Accredited professionals have reported through surveys that the APR process is reflective, introspective and knowledge-expanding. And while we celebrate those employers who require the APR as a requisite for employment or financially reward those who achieve this milestone, a vast majority of APRs find contentment in the personal rewards Accreditation offers. Through a process that 96 percent of APRs surveyed find valuable, 96 percent would recommend to a colleague, and 93 percent feel assessed the skills needed to succeed in the profession, APRs acknowledge the credential for building confidence and credibility while expanding their knowledge content.
Gaining marketplace credibility. Accreditation is not a new concept to corporate America. Manufacturers, educational institutions, medical facilities and the like seek the integrity that comes with their industry’s or discipline’s accrediting endorsement. Should it not make sense that companies would seek the same in their hiring practices? Consider that the human resource industry itself has, not one, but two distinct accrediting levels for human resource professionals. Accredited public relations professionals demonstrate their commitment to mastering – and continuing to develop – the knowledge, skills and abilities, or KSAs, desired by today’s employers. The APR credential also helps employers clearly and effectively evaluate one’s qualifications when compared to applicants from other professions who see public relations as a chance to “try something new” or to take their career “in a new direction.”
Defining the profession. The Accreditation process benefits our profession by bringing structure and definition to it. As part of the Universal Accreditation Board’s 2003 effort to redesign the APR process, APR leaders sought a better understanding of what our profession entails and what it takes to be successful in today’s PR environment. And guess what? It didn’t reveal necessary characteristics like “being a people person.” It created clear delineations between the tactical and strategic practice levels, emphasized the professional’s counselor role, and clarified that public relations doesn’t “just happen” – it is a deliberate, ethically based executive function with measurable results.
Accreditation in Public Relations has prepared – and continues to prepare – professionals to lead by example in our industry and in our associations. Within the nine participating organizations of the Universal Accreditation Board, you’ll find within these associations’ top volunteer and paid leadership levels Accredited professionals equipped to advance the opportunities for their fellow professionals and our profession. As a result, those who have demonstrated an intricate understanding of our profession and their own professional practice are imminently qualified to see our industry into the coming decades.
I’m not suggesting that “APR” comes emblazoned on its own red-and-blue spandex outfit, part of a gadget-ridden utility belt or with powers sufficient to gain you a title role on NBC’s Heroes. What it does, however, is empower professionals in a manner each finds befitting their personal, professional and volunteer expectations. For professionals eager to distinguish themselves in today’s marketplace, Accreditation in Public Relations offers a means of garnering positive attention and that “second glance” in a way that wearing a cape to work never will.
Power up today at www.praccreditation.org.
Michael Tullier, APR, is director of external relations for the Auburn University College of Education in Auburn, Ala. An award-winning public relations professional with more than 15 years of experience as an organization’s chief public relations counsel and spokesperson, Michael achieved accreditation in 2003. Tullier served as chair of the Universal Accreditation Board in 2008 and is its current immediate past chair. During his UAB tenure, which began in 2005, he has represented both the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) and Southern Public Relations Federation (SPRF).
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Public Relations versus Advertising
Our guest "Phlogger" this week is Mary White, MA, SPHR.
Many people have the misconception that publicity and advertising are the same things. While both publicity and advertising can play important roles in an organization’s overall marketing plan, they are very different. The three primary differences between publicity and advertising are (2) control, (2) cost, and (3) credibility.
Control: Advertising is a controlled form of communication, whereas public relations is uncontrolled. When you run an advertisement in a print publication, you purchase a specific amount of space on a page to run in a particular issue of the publication. You may even be able to specify that your ad be placed on the top left corner of the sports page. You control the content of the ad as well.
With publicity, you don’t dictate when, where, or if your promotional messages ever see the light of day. You can send a news release to a print publication, and the editor or journalist who receives it might see value in it and print it in the next issue. He or she might really find the information appealing and interview you for a cover story. However, your news release might just as easily end up in the garbage can, depending on its relevance, timing, or a number of other factors.
Cost: The control that you get with advertising doesn’t come without a price. The reason that you can specify when and where your advertisement will run is that you pay for the space, airtime, or bandwidth that it occupies. You are able to control the content because you also pay to have the advertisement itself created. Some advertisements can be produced inexpensively, and others are very costly.
When you are trying to generate publicity for your business through public relations efforts, the only cost is the manpower that it takes to create the documents that you send out to the news media and the costs of delivering or shipping. It is much less expensive to send a photograph and a news release to a magazine editor than it is to create a 4-color, camera-ready magazine ad.
Credibility: With advertising, you are able to make sure that the exact message that you want appears in the media exactly as you have specified. When consumers see an advertisement, most of them are aware that it is a paid promotion. Some consumers tend to be a little bit suspicious of advertising messages for this reason.
However, when your local newspaper runs a feature article about your business as a result of a news release that you sent to the editor, consumers generally don’t stop and think that the story started with a promotional message from the company. A story in the newspaper is generally considered to be much more credible than an advertisement in the newspaper. The reason for this is the third party endorsement effect associated with having someone outside your company saying good things about it.
The best marketing plans include a mixture of advertising and publicity. It’s important that you understand the differences between these two forms of communication so that you can make sound decisions about the ideal mix for your organization.
About the Author: Mary G. White, M.A., SPHR is the Training Coordinator for Mobile Technical Institute & MTI Business Solutions (http://www.mobiletechwebsite.com), where she specializes in human resources, management, and marketing training. She teaches open enrollment classes for MTI, provides on-site corporate training, and frequently speaks at conferences and association meetings. She is also the author of 101 Successful PR Campaign Tips in the LifeTips book series. MTI provides a variety of consulting services, including IT Training, certification testing, HR consulting, and custom database development. For free career and business development tips, see http://www.DailyCareerConnection.com and http://www.DailyBizSolutions.com.
Check out our "Blog of the Month": http://www.hyku.com/blog/
Many people have the misconception that publicity and advertising are the same things. While both publicity and advertising can play important roles in an organization’s overall marketing plan, they are very different. The three primary differences between publicity and advertising are (2) control, (2) cost, and (3) credibility.
Control: Advertising is a controlled form of communication, whereas public relations is uncontrolled. When you run an advertisement in a print publication, you purchase a specific amount of space on a page to run in a particular issue of the publication. You may even be able to specify that your ad be placed on the top left corner of the sports page. You control the content of the ad as well.
With publicity, you don’t dictate when, where, or if your promotional messages ever see the light of day. You can send a news release to a print publication, and the editor or journalist who receives it might see value in it and print it in the next issue. He or she might really find the information appealing and interview you for a cover story. However, your news release might just as easily end up in the garbage can, depending on its relevance, timing, or a number of other factors.
Cost: The control that you get with advertising doesn’t come without a price. The reason that you can specify when and where your advertisement will run is that you pay for the space, airtime, or bandwidth that it occupies. You are able to control the content because you also pay to have the advertisement itself created. Some advertisements can be produced inexpensively, and others are very costly.
When you are trying to generate publicity for your business through public relations efforts, the only cost is the manpower that it takes to create the documents that you send out to the news media and the costs of delivering or shipping. It is much less expensive to send a photograph and a news release to a magazine editor than it is to create a 4-color, camera-ready magazine ad.
Credibility: With advertising, you are able to make sure that the exact message that you want appears in the media exactly as you have specified. When consumers see an advertisement, most of them are aware that it is a paid promotion. Some consumers tend to be a little bit suspicious of advertising messages for this reason.
However, when your local newspaper runs a feature article about your business as a result of a news release that you sent to the editor, consumers generally don’t stop and think that the story started with a promotional message from the company. A story in the newspaper is generally considered to be much more credible than an advertisement in the newspaper. The reason for this is the third party endorsement effect associated with having someone outside your company saying good things about it.
The best marketing plans include a mixture of advertising and publicity. It’s important that you understand the differences between these two forms of communication so that you can make sound decisions about the ideal mix for your organization.
About the Author: Mary G. White, M.A., SPHR is the Training Coordinator for Mobile Technical Institute & MTI Business Solutions (http://www.mobiletechwebsite.com), where she specializes in human resources, management, and marketing training. She teaches open enrollment classes for MTI, provides on-site corporate training, and frequently speaks at conferences and association meetings. She is also the author of 101 Successful PR Campaign Tips in the LifeTips book series. MTI provides a variety of consulting services, including IT Training, certification testing, HR consulting, and custom database development. For free career and business development tips, see http://www.DailyCareerConnection.com and http://www.DailyBizSolutions.com.
Check out our "Blog of the Month": http://www.hyku.com/blog/
Labels:
advertising,
get publicity,
marketing,
media coverage,
media exposure,
pr,
public relations,
publicity
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)